Deep State Hack Thinks Trump Is Still President
Fiona Hill’s recent New York Times op-ed confirms what conservatives have known: she is a Deep State hack. In her piece she claims that President Vladimir Putin saw an opportunity to renew aggression toward Ukraine because the US was left weakened by four “disastrous” years under former President Donald Trump.
Hill wrote “From Russia’s perspective, America’s domestic travails after four years of Donald Trump’s disastrous presidency, as well as the rifts he created with U.S allies…signal weakness. Her arguments seem a little simplistic coming from a so-called expert.
What rifts is Hill referring to here? Is she referring to when Trump demanded our NATO allies actually contribute more to their own defense? If trying to make NATO a stronger military adversary to Russia creates a rift between the U.S and Europe then that relationship was already coming apart.
Perhaps Hill, as an expert, should admit that the situation is more complicated. If she dared to look back more than four years she would see that Europe wasn’t too happy with the Obama administration either. Removing missile defense systems from eastern European nations to appease Putin sure didn’t make NATO any stronger. One could make the argument that it was this Obama action that led Russia to invade Ukraine in 2014. Maybe that’s why Hill focuses on the last four years.
Just using common sense to Hill’s argument seems to further erode its validity. If the US was so weakened by the Trump presidency, why didn’t Putin renew his aggression against Ukraine during his term? It appears Putin, along with Hill seem to think that Trump is still president. I guess it makes sense that they don’t know Biden is president because he doesn’t as well. Either Putin is really slow in trying to take advantage of Trump induced weakness or something else is at play here.
If we take a page from the Liberal playbook we would have to consider that Biden is compromised by Putin. Why else would he refuse to sanction the NordStream 2 pipeline when President Trump wanted to stop it? Hill would argue, as others have, that sanctioning the pipeline would hurt U.S/ German relations. If this is the case one must ask why our ally is working together with our number one geopolitical foe? A country that ‘hacked’ our election. Hill doesnt address this issue.
Hill also ignores the fact that President Biden and Germany tacitly agreed to sellout Ukraine so that Germany could have access to Russian oil and natural gas. That is the result of the Nordstream pipeline being approved. It allows Russia to retake part of the Soviet empire while still having access to Europe’s oil and gas market. President Biden agreed to this Munich Agreement 2.0 and we are seeing the same consequences as the first.
Hill’s op-ed is an attempt to deflect the blame from the coming conflict from her and the other Deep State actors. and the Biden administration onto Trump. Biden’s base, who gobbled up all the collusion delusion propaganda are too stupid to realize that it was their side all along that facilitated Putin’s plan.
